From levinthal ' s paradox to protein structure prediction 佯謬到蛋白質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)預(yù)測(cè)
Russell ' s paradox and kantor ' s two errors in set theory 羅素悖論與康托在集合論中的兩個(gè)失誤
D ' alembert ' s paradox 達(dá)朗貝爾悖論
But as the maker of the policy and the leader of the reform are just the profit - earning group under the old institution , so they did n ' t want to reform at all . so appeared the typical north ' s paradox 但由于政策的制定者和改革的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者即是舊制度下龐大的既得利益群體,他們?yōu)榫S護(hù)自身的利益,根本不愿意進(jìn)行徹底的改革,出現(xiàn)了典型的諾斯悖論。
Max weber ' s paradox of rationality and habermas ' s communicative rationality about rebuilding modernity provide a thought of understanding modern education ' s dilemma , seeking a possible solution , and rebuilding modern education ' s rationality for us 韋伯的合理性的悖論和哈貝馬斯的交往合理性對(duì)現(xiàn)代性的重建,為我們認(rèn)識(shí)現(xiàn)代教育的困境及尋求可能的解決途徑,重建現(xiàn)代教育的合理性提供了一條思路。
Finally , through the analysis of the effect of the conservatism ' s application to accounting system , the author points out that the " double - edged sword " function of conservatism ' s application in accounting system proved the existence of conservatism ' s paradox again , the existence of conservatism ' s inherent logic contradiction and its paradox also indicate that conservatism itself must be innovated , and that conservatism must be endowed with new connotation 最后,通過(guò)總結(jié)分析謹(jǐn)慎性原則在會(huì)計(jì)系統(tǒng)中的實(shí)際應(yīng)用效果,筆者指出,謹(jǐn)慎性原則在我國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)實(shí)務(wù)的運(yùn)用所形成的“雙刃劍”作用再次證明了其悍論的存在,這同時(shí)也說(shuō)明了謹(jǐn)慎性原則內(nèi)在邏輯性矛盾及其所導(dǎo)致的謹(jǐn)慎性原則悍論的存在預(yù)示著謹(jǐn)慎性原則自身的變革勢(shì)在必行,謹(jǐn)慎性原則必須被賦予新的內(nèi)涵。
Following , on the basis of above - mentioned theoretic analysis this thesis points out that the inherent logic contradiction in conservatism is the essence of its paradox . because conservatism itself possesses unavoidable inherent logic inconsistency , a great deal of contradictions and conflicts were brought about in accounting system in the application iv of conservatism to accounting system . it may be said , these contradictions and conflicts are the representation of the conservatism ' s paradox 接下來(lái),筆者在上述理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上指出,謹(jǐn)慎性原則本身的內(nèi)在邏輯矛盾是形成其悻論的本質(zhì)內(nèi)容,正是由于謹(jǐn)慎性原則本身具有不可避免的內(nèi)在邏輯不一致性,才使得其運(yùn)用于會(huì)計(jì)系統(tǒng)中產(chǎn)生了諸多矛盾和沖突,可以說(shuō),這些矛盾和沖突是謹(jǐn)慎性原則悼論的外在表現(xiàn)。